Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/8085
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Huseynov, Vasif | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-15T05:42:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-15T05:42:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025-09-11 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.commonspace.eu/opinion/what-role-eu-post-washington-south-caucasus | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/8085 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The agreements reached in the US-mediated summit of the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders in Washington on August 8 are poised to fundamentally reshape the region's future. Particularly, the deal concerning the Zangezur corridor – rebranded as the “Trump Route for Peace and Prosperity” (TRIPP) – holds significant geopolitical importance. If implemented, the TRIPP agreement would deal a severe blow to the regional standing of Russia and Iran. More importantly, it would pave the way for a strategic U.S. presence in this critical geography. This outcome represents a success that few would have predicted for the United States, especially for the Trump administration, given the region's notoriously complex and volatile geopolitics. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Commonspace.eu | en_US |
dc.title | What role for the EU in the post-Washington South Caucasus? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
What role for the EU in the post-Washington South Caucasus.pdf | 133.67 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.