Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/5111
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVernygor, Vlad-
dc.contributor.authorChaban, Natalia-
dc.contributor.authorYi, Chae-Deug-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-27T11:31:42Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-27T11:31:42Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citation2 (Scopus)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/5111-
dc.description.abstracthis paper contributes to the debate on the multidimensional phenomenon of Asian regional integration. Considering one case study – a regional grouping known as ‘ASEAN+3’ – this paper offsets it against relevant achievements on the European continent. Admitting that direct application of the EU’s model to the ASEAN+3 frameworks is fruitless, this study uses a different approach, treating the EU’s legal composition as a leading tool to assess if the European ‘know how’ in regional integration could be applied to facilitate the inter-relations within the ASEAN+3. Three barriers to regional integration are explored: differing democratic practices, dominating intergovernmental interactions, and the globally (vs. regionally) orientated China. Yet, this paper argues that the aforementioned challenges have a potential not only to subvert, but, paradoxically, reinforce the Asian integration process, particularly within the ASEAN+3 grouping.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournalTrames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences;16(1), 47-64., pp. 47-54-
dc.subjectAsian integrationen_US
dc.subjectASEAN+3en_US
dc.subjectfunctional capacity of integrationen_US
dc.subjectthe EU’s legal profileen_US
dc.titleMirroring the EU? Functional capacity of integration in Asiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
trames-2012-1-47-61.pdf154.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.