Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/4066
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Astorga, Miguel-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-01T06:04:01Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-01T06:04:01Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationKhazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.issn2223-2621-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/4066-
dc.description.abstractThe mental models theory has shown that the logical connectives do not always refer to the interpretation assigned to them by standard logic. Several papers authored by its proponents clearly reveal that in the cases of the conditional and disjunction. In this paper, following a methodology of analysis akin to that of the mental models theory, I try to check whether or not the same applies to conjunction, and my conclusion is that, indeed, this last connective can be linked to any of the sixteen possible interpretations that a logical operator relating two clauses can have.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKhazar University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol. 22;№ 2-
dc.subjectanden_US
dc.subjectconjunctionen_US
dc.subjectlogical connectiveen_US
dc.subjectmental modelsen_US
dc.subjectsemanticsen_US
dc.title‘And’ is not always a logical conjunctionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:2019, Vol. 22, № 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
‘And’ is not always a logical conjunction.pdf180.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.