Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/4066
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | López-Astorga, Miguel | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-01T06:04:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-01T06:04:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2223-2621 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/4066 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The mental models theory has shown that the logical connectives do not always refer to the interpretation assigned to them by standard logic. Several papers authored by its proponents clearly reveal that in the cases of the conditional and disjunction. In this paper, following a methodology of analysis akin to that of the mental models theory, I try to check whether or not the same applies to conjunction, and my conclusion is that, indeed, this last connective can be linked to any of the sixteen possible interpretations that a logical operator relating two clauses can have. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Khazar University Press | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vol. 22;№ 2 | - |
dc.subject | and | en_US |
dc.subject | conjunction | en_US |
dc.subject | logical connective | en_US |
dc.subject | mental models | en_US |
dc.subject | semantics | en_US |
dc.title | ‘And’ is not always a logical conjunction | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | 2019, Vol. 22, № 2 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘And’ is not always a logical conjunction.pdf | 180.39 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.