Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/3240
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQasem, Mamun Ali Naji-
dc.contributor.authorGul, Showkeen Bilal Ahmad-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-09T13:08:17Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-09T13:08:17Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn2223-2621-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/3240-
dc.description.abstractDevelopers of attitudinal questionnaires/ scales (of which questionnaires that compute satisfaction with usability are one type) are trained to consider questionnaire response styles such as extreme response bias and acquiescence bias. In acquiescence bias, respondents tend to agree with all or almost all statements in a questionnaire (Lewis and Sauro, 2009). The acute response bias is the inclination to mark the extremes of rating scales rather than points near the middle of the scale. To the amount that these biases exist, the affected responses do not provide a true measure of an attitude. Acquiescence bias is of particular apprehension because it leads to an upward error in measurement, giving researchers too positive a picture of whatever attitude they are measuring.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherKhazar University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 17;Number 3-
dc.titleEffect of Items Direction (Positive or Negative) on the Factorial Construction and Criterion related Validity in Likert Scaleen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:2014, Vol. 17, № 3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
6NEW-Effect-of-Items-Direction.pdf296.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.